| From: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Leon Pu <leon_xf_pu(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)cn>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL support on Redhat Advance Server 2.1 |
| Date: | 2006-03-27 12:16:29 |
| Message-ID: | 1143461789.3396.3.camel@pgbuildfarm.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 06:03 -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> I'd hope that RH would support at least the
> most recent version of 7.4, since presumably that's part of what they
> pay Tom for... Just understand that 7.4 is approaching end-of-life.
> (Presumably so is RHEL2...)
RH won't support a newer (or older) major version of PostgreSQL which is
not included in RHEL 2.1. This is Red Hat's policy -- they do not update
to new major release in a distribution. I mean, (AFAIR) RHEL 2.1 ships
with PostgreSQL 7.3 and they won't support a newer major version.
However, I agree with you, if the support is the primary concern, there
are some support options around.
Regards,
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PL/php, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-03-27 12:38:47 | Re: A place to post pgbench results |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-03-27 12:14:07 | Re: experiences needed - how does Itanium2/1.5GHz(4MB) compare to AMD and Intel CPUs as far as Postgresql is concerned |