Re: pg_service.conf

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_service.conf
Date: 2006-02-19 15:56:11
Message-ID: 200602191656.12542.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Mark Woodward wrote:
> Don't get me wrong, DNS, as it is designed, is PERFECT for the
> distributed nature of the internet, but replication of fairly static
> data under the control of a central authority (the admin) is better.

What about this zeroconf/bonjour stuff? I'm not familiar with it, but
it sounds like it could tie into this discussion.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-02-19 16:10:45 Re: pg_service.conf
Previous Message Mark Woodward 2006-02-19 15:52:18 Re: pg_service.conf

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-02-19 16:10:45 Re: pg_service.conf
Previous Message Mark Woodward 2006-02-19 15:52:18 Re: pg_service.conf