From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_service.conf |
Date: | 2006-02-19 15:56:11 |
Message-ID: | 200602191656.12542.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Mark Woodward wrote:
> Don't get me wrong, DNS, as it is designed, is PERFECT for the
> distributed nature of the internet, but replication of fairly static
> data under the control of a central authority (the admin) is better.
What about this zeroconf/bonjour stuff? I'm not familiar with it, but
it sounds like it could tie into this discussion.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-02-19 16:10:45 | Re: pg_service.conf |
Previous Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-02-19 15:52:18 | Re: pg_service.conf |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-02-19 16:10:45 | Re: pg_service.conf |
Previous Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-02-19 15:52:18 | Re: pg_service.conf |