| From: | "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_service.conf |
| Date: | 2006-02-19 18:57:26 |
| Message-ID: | 16430.24.91.171.78.1140375446.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> Mark Woodward wrote:
>> Don't get me wrong, DNS, as it is designed, is PERFECT for the
>> distributed nature of the internet, but replication of fairly static
>> data under the control of a central authority (the admin) is better.
>
> What about this zeroconf/bonjour stuff? I'm not familiar with it, but
> it sounds like it could tie into this discussion.
>
Perhaps zeroconf is useful for stuff like thin clients, but I'm not sure
that it introduces anything into this discussion.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-02-19 18:57:42 | Re: Domains and supporting functions |
| Previous Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-02-19 18:55:19 | Re: pg_service.conf |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-02-19 18:59:50 | Re: pg_service.conf |
| Previous Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-02-19 18:55:19 | Re: pg_service.conf |