From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Brendan Duddridge <brendan(at)clickspace(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgresql-General General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Same data, different results in Postgres vs. FrontBase |
Date: | 2006-02-19 08:02:04 |
Message-ID: | 20060218235434.U26809@megazone.bigpanda.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006, Brendan Duddridge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a query that returns 569 rows in FrontBase, but only 30 rows
> in Postgres. The data is the same as I just finished copying my
> entire database over from FrontBase to Postgres.
>
> I've reduced my problem to the following statement and have
> discovered that FrontBase returns null rows along with the rows that
> match the query and PostgreSQL only returns the not null rows.
>
> CON.IS_SUBSCRIBED NOT IN ('X', 'P')
>
> Is that normal?
Short form from the spec as we read it:
RVC NOT IN (IPV) => NOT (RVC IN (IPV)) => NOT (RVC =ANY IPV)
The result of RVC =ANY IPV can be described with:
If the implied comparison predicate [ RVC = IPVi] is true for at least
one row IPVi in IPV then true
If the implied comparison predicate is false for every row IPVi in IPV
then false
Otherwise unknown.
NULL = 'X' returns unknown, as does NULL = 'P', so the last case is the
one that should apply. NOT (unknown) is unknown, so the result of
CON.IS_SUBSCRIBED NOT IN ('X', 'P') is unknown for NULL IS_SUBSCRIBED.
Where clauses pass rows where the result of the clause is true, so those
rows are not part of the result.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kenéz Attila | 2006-02-19 08:39:02 | pgplsql and notifications |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-19 06:31:13 | Re: Same data, different results in Postgres vs. FrontBase |