| From: | Michael Crozier <crozierm(at)conducivetech(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: RAID-50 |
| Date: | 2006-01-19 00:38:40 |
| Message-ID: | 200601181638.40085.crozierm@conducivetech.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> I once read in an O'Reilly book on tuning Solaris about RAID-50. That's
> right multiple RAID-5 disk sets each treated as a single logical drive then
> striped with RAID-0. The book said that if built correctly load balancing
> could make performance approach RAID-10 at considerably lower cost for VERY
> large storage arrays.
>
> Have any list members had experience with RAID-50?
There have been a few recent discussions on the pg-performance mailing list
that touched on RAID-50. I'm sorry, but I don't remember the conclusions (if
there were any). I'd suggest a peek at the archives.
Are you researching this for Postgresql Solaris? I would certainly appreciate
hearing about any of your findings, especially if this is for a
PG/Solaris/LVM combination.
Regards,
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-19 00:43:12 | Re: No heap lookups on index |
| Previous Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2006-01-19 00:34:52 | Re: PostgreSQL Top 10 Wishlist |