Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> Solution.pm has this:
>> ...
>> from which HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT seems to be suspiciously missing?
> Right, but it is missing in pg_config.h, too, right?
No, it does get defined on Unix builds (if appropriate), both in
pg_config.h and ecpg_config.h. As far as I can see in a quick
grep, the core code doesn't use that symbol anywhere anyway ...
but ecpg does. It's the fact that ecpg_config.h gets the
symbol defined on Unix builds but not MSVC builds that Andrew
is on about.
regards, tom lane