Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: jallen(at)americansavingslife(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT
Date: 2018-02-24 19:49:26
Message-ID: 1519501766.2510.13.camel@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

> Solution.pm has this:
> ...
> from which HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT seems to be suspiciously missing?

Right, but it is missing in pg_config.h, too, right? I have no personal
experience with the Windows build, so I cannot tell if it should be
defined.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-02-24 20:03:14 Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-02-24 19:21:23 Re: BUG #15080: ecpg on windows doesn't define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT