Re: LVM and Postgres

From: Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: LVM and Postgres
Date: 2005-12-07 04:14:45
Message-ID: 20051207041445.GA6841@filer
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Michael Stone wrote:
> Note that the WAL will
> wander around the disk as files are created and deleted, whereas tables
> are basically updated in place.

Huh? I was rather under the impression that the WAL files (in
pg_xlog, right?) were reused once they'd been created, so their
locations on the disk should remain the same, as should their data
blocks (roughly, depending on the implementation of the filesystem, of
course).

--
Kevin Brown kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-12-07 04:18:24 Re: Query Fails with error calloc - Cannot alocate memory
Previous Message Rick Schumeyer 2005-12-07 03:06:52 table partitioning: effects of many sub-tables (was COPY too slow...)