Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > OK, updated text:
> >
> > --with-openssl build with OpenSSL support
> > --with-libedit-preferred prefer Libedit over Libreadline
> > --without-readline do not use Libreadline/Libedit line editing
> > --without-zlib do not use Zlib
>
> This all seems kind of extra... Why not just:
>
> --with-libedit Use libedit instead of readline
> --with-readline Use readline instead of libedit (default)
> --without-readline Use when readline is not available
>

Did you read my later posting? There is no reasonable default for
those unless we want to disable libedit detection by default, and as Tom
mentioned, for OSX it isn't even clear which one you have found.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073