Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Date: 2005-12-02 19:01:05
Message-ID: 1133550065.16716.16.camel@jd.commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-ports


> OK, updated text:
>
> --with-openssl build with OpenSSL support
> --with-libedit-preferred prefer Libedit over Libreadline
> --without-readline do not use Libreadline/Libedit line editing
> --without-zlib do not use Zlib

This all seems kind of extra... Why not just:

--with-libedit Use libedit instead of readline
--with-readline Use readline instead of libedit (default)
--without-readline Use when readline is not available

Joshua D. Drake

>
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-02 19:09:08 Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-02 18:54:33 Re: Numeric 508 datatype

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-02 19:09:08 Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-02 18:54:33 Re: Numeric 508 datatype

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-02 20:12:15 Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-02 18:52:07 Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?