From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Strange interval arithmetic |
Date: | 2005-11-30 22:06:42 |
Message-ID: | 20051130220642.GA15341@surnet.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Michael Fuhr wrote:
> Agreed. I'm thinking about rewriting strtol() calls in datetime.c
> to look like this:
>
> errno = 0;
> val = strtol(field[i], &cp, 10);
> if (errno == ERANGE)
> return DTERR_FIELD_OVERFLOW;
Hmm, why not check both the return value _and_ errno:
val = strtol(field[i], &cp, 10);
if (val == LONG_MAX && errno == ERANGE)
return DTERR_FIELD_OVERFLOW;
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-11-30 22:18:23 | Re: Strange interval arithmetic |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2005-11-30 21:53:33 | Re: [ADMIN] ERROR: could not read block |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-11-30 22:18:23 | Re: Strange interval arithmetic |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-11-30 21:50:18 | Re: Strange interval arithmetic |