| From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase |
| Date: | 2005-10-19 19:39:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20051019123716.V94375@megazone.bigpanda.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Dann Corbit wrote:
> Yes, clearly that is the wrong result according to the SQL standard.
>
> Here is a SQL*Server query:
> select 1 where 'a' = 'a ' AND 'a' = 'a ' AND 'a ' = 'a '
>
> It returns (correctly): 1
Doesn't that depend on the collating sequence in use, or is a NO PAD
collating sequence not allowed here?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2005-10-19 19:42:55 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase |
| Previous Message | Terry Fielder | 2005-10-19 19:37:09 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2005-10-19 19:42:55 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2005-10-19 19:33:57 | Re: A costing analysis tool |