Re: Lost patches email

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lost patches email
Date: 2005-10-08 16:58:50
Message-ID: 200510081658.j98GwoZ08734@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Actually, I suspect that won't work anyway, since now its a duplicate of
> one that was already processed, which is why it would fail ...
>
> We'll have to keep a close eye on this for the next one you know didn't go
> through, and I'm waiting for details from the developers on how I can
> improve reporting without filling up the file system with debug messages
> :(

I just sent a new copy that is not a bounce but a new email, and I added
a '[ repost ]' line at the top.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-10-08 17:06:05 Re: Lost patches email
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-10-08 16:56:04 Re: Lost patches email