| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Lost patches email |
| Date: | 2005-10-08 17:06:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20051008140517.C1477@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>
>> Actually, I suspect that won't work anyway, since now its a duplicate of
>> one that was already processed, which is why it would fail ...
>>
>> We'll have to keep a close eye on this for the next one you know didn't go
>> through, and I'm waiting for details from the developers on how I can
>> improve reporting without filling up the file system with debug messages
>> :(
>
> OK, the repost went through. Seems somehow the original email did not
> get processed, and my bounces are automatically deleted, but a new email
> worked. Strange.
According to our end, your original did get processed, but failed ... the
problem is, there are no details (that I can find) on *why* it failed ...
that is what I sent out to the developers, how to determine why it failed
without having to turn debug logging *way* up :(
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-10-08 17:39:39 | Re: Lost patches email |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-10-08 16:58:50 | Re: Lost patches email |