From: | Joÿffffffffffe3o Carvalho <joaocarvalho127(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: queries problems |
Date: | 2005-09-08 22:33:48 |
Message-ID: | 20050908223348.21917.qmail@web50614.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
The problem here is to compare int2vector with int2.
Regards
João Carvalho
Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> escreveu:
[Please copy the mailing list on replies so others can contribute
to and learn from the discussion.]
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 10:33:44PM -0300, João Carvalho wrote:
> Michael Fuhr escreveu:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/monitoring.html
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/catalogs.html
>
> Tanks a lot, it is part of that information in there. I resolved
> the schema problem and probably the toast table problem. but I still
> can´t get any information in there about the users of the locks and
> wich atributes are part of each index.
For locks, you can join pg_locks.pid with pg_stat_activity.procpid
and get user names from pg_stat_activity.usename.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/view-pg-locks.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/monitoring-stats.html#MONITORING-STATS-VIEWS-TABLE
For index attributes, see pg_index.indkey and pg_attribute.attnum,
or the pg_get_indexdef() function.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/catalog-pg-index.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/catalog-pg-attribute.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/functions-info.html#FUNCTIONS-INFO-CATALOG-TABLE
--
Michael Fuhr
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger com voz: PROMOÇÃO VOCÊ PODE LEVAR UMA VIAGEM NA CONVERSA. Participe!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-09-08 23:54:35 | Re: queries problems |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-09-08 22:04:27 | Re: Statistics from Sequences |