Re: queries problems

From: Joÿffffffffffe3o Carvalho <joaocarvalho127(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: queries problems
Date: 2005-09-08 22:33:48
Message-ID: 20050908223348.21917.qmail@web50614.mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

The problem here is to compare int2vector with int2.

Regards
João Carvalho

Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> escreveu:
[Please copy the mailing list on replies so others can contribute
to and learn from the discussion.]

On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 10:33:44PM -0300, João Carvalho wrote:
> Michael Fuhr escreveu:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/monitoring.html
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/catalogs.html
>
> Tanks a lot, it is part of that information in there. I resolved
> the schema problem and probably the toast table problem. but I still
> can´t get any information in there about the users of the locks and
> wich atributes are part of each index.

For locks, you can join pg_locks.pid with pg_stat_activity.procpid
and get user names from pg_stat_activity.usename.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/view-pg-locks.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/monitoring-stats.html#MONITORING-STATS-VIEWS-TABLE

For index attributes, see pg_index.indkey and pg_attribute.attnum,
or the pg_get_indexdef() function.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/catalog-pg-index.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/catalog-pg-attribute.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/functions-info.html#FUNCTIONS-INFO-CATALOG-TABLE

--
Michael Fuhr

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger com voz: PROMOÇÃO VOCÊ PODE LEVAR UMA VIAGEM NA CONVERSA. Participe!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-09-08 23:54:35 Re: queries problems
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-09-08 22:04:27 Re: Statistics from Sequences