From: | Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Certification Available +Pronounce |
Date: | 2005-08-25 04:31:42 |
Message-ID: | 200508250031.42856.robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On August 24, 2005 05:52 pm, David Fetter wrote:
> > government agencies and some companies where written certifications
> > are required for consideration. No matter how you personally feel
> > about the validity of certifications, there are large organizations
> > which are wedded to them. PostgreSQL not having certifications
> > won't change their minds; it'll just exclude PostgreSQL from
> > competition.
>
> Excellent point. We need to make sure that any PostgreSQL
> certification that they use actually means something, as I outlined
> above. That these certifications may be very expensive by their
> nature doesn't exclude this from happening :)
Are you guys familiar with the community movement of creating a BSD
certifications standard, http://bsdcertification.org?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Travers | 2005-08-25 06:23:00 | Re: Certification Available +Pronounce |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2005-08-24 21:52:56 | Re: Certification Available +Pronounce |