Re: Certification Available +Pronounce

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Cleary <robert(dot)cleary(at)ul(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: Certification Available +Pronounce
Date: 2005-08-24 21:52:56
Message-ID: 20050824215256.GC12612@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 02:15:13PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> David,
>
> > I am not aware of any area where the opinions are "mixed" on
> > certifications, except in the sense that incompetent HR people
> > like them and the people who have to work with (or worse yet, deal
> > with the result from) certified incompetents do not.
>
> PostgreSQL (and other OSS software) is being considered for
> government agencies and some companies where written certifications
> are required for consideration. No matter how you personally feel
> about the validity of certifications, there are large organizations
> which are wedded to them. PostgreSQL not having certifications
> won't change their minds; it'll just exclude PostgreSQL from
> competition.

Excellent point. We need to make sure that any PostgreSQL
certification that they use actually means something, as I outlined
above. That these certifications may be very expensive by their
nature doesn't exclude this from happening :)

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Bernier 2005-08-25 04:31:42 Re: Certification Available +Pronounce
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-08-24 21:15:13 Re: Certification Available +Pronounce