Re: enable_constraint_exclusion GUC name

pgman wrote:
> Is enable_constraint_exclusion the proper name for this feature? I know
> we have enable* in the optimizer settings, but that naming seems
> unfortunate in that we should have just called it hash_join and it could
> be enabled/disabled.
>
> I am thinking we should just call it constraint_exclusion.

So, given the silence on this, I assume people think we should rename
this before beta starts.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073