Re: 5 new entries for FAQ

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 5 new entries for FAQ
Date: 2005-08-10 21:22:58
Message-ID: 20050810212255.GH27574@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 03:33:16PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> For the batch job and single-CPU issues, they did not fit into existing
> FAQ entries, and I am not sure they are asked enough to be added as
> FAQs. I am interested to hear other's opinions on this.

Maybe, just looking through my email and my memories they've been a few
times. How often a question needs to be asked before putting it in the
FAQ is easier than answering it each time, well, that's a matter of
debate.

The other extreme is the Exim FAQ which is huge, but it has answered
every question I've ever asked. Not sure if that's a goal though.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Havasvölgyi Ottó 2005-08-10 21:33:59 PL/PGSQL parameter count vs perfomace
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-08-10 21:13:50 Re: escape string type for upcoming 8.1