From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: escape string type for upcoming 8.1 |
Date: | 2005-08-10 21:13:50 |
Message-ID: | 200508102113.j7ALDo327693@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Greg Stark wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
> > > What happens if someone already has a type called "e" ?
> >
> > That would be the same problem as someone having a type 'b' or 'x'. It
> > would still work, but not for casts like text'str'. Those letters are
> > caught in the lexer before getting into to the parser.
>
> What I'm asking about is, are there going to be user applications that were
> working fine in previous versions but suddenly start breaking when this change
> is made? Does that affect your decision in whether to backport this to 8.0.x?
The use of "E" as a data type that is used as E'' seems pretty rare, but
I suppose it is possible. We really haven't even discussed the idea of
backporting anything, it is just an open issue at the time we release an
8.0.X.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-08-10 21:22:58 | Re: 5 new entries for FAQ |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-10 21:05:07 | Re: 5 new entries for FAQ |