| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Problem with dblink regression test |
| Date: | 2005-06-22 16:47:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20050622164705.GA84822@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 08:49:12PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
> I think most people would expect that if they don't specify a port, they
> would be talking to the same postmaster that they are running under on
> whatever port it is using, not some compiled in default. So your
> proposal makes perfect sense to me. Then the dblink regression test
> would not specify a port at all, correct?
Actually, the regression test currently doesn't specify a port. If it
did we wouldn't have found this problem.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-06-22 16:48:21 | commit_delay, siblings |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-06-22 16:45:47 | Re: Problem with dblink regression test |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-22 16:48:05 | Re: plperl validator function |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-06-22 16:45:47 | Re: Problem with dblink regression test |