Re: plperl validator function

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> That attached 2 patches implement a validator function for plperl, and
> support for it in createlang.

Applied. (BTW, a single patch file is generally easier to deal with.)

> This has somewhat less utility than do such functions for languages with
> stricter compiletime as opposed to runtime requirements, but I still
> think it's useful. If this is acceptable I'll provide a regression test
> in due course - I don't think any documentation is required.

I don't really see the need for a separate regression test --- the thing
is implicitly exercised by each function you create, anyway.

regards, tom lane