Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments
Date: 2005-05-12 21:52:43
Message-ID: 200505121752.43484.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thursday 12 May 2005 01:32, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > FWIW, I don't see the issue as "internal vs external" at all. What's
> > bothering me is whether these views can be considered sufficiently
> > more stable and better designed than the physical system catalogs
> > to justify recommending that application designers should rely on
> > the views instead of the catalogs. That point doesn't seem to me
> > to have been proven. The recent arguments in favor seem to boil down to
> > "novices will find these easier to use", which is very possibly true,
> > but novices don't have the same needs as programs.
>
> As lead phpPgAdmin developer, I'm officially in favour of them. The
> main reason being all the extra fruit they have that shows database
> size, etc.
>

As non-lead phpPgAdmin developer, I'd be against using them in phppgadmin.
(note this doesnt mean I am against them in pgsql itself)

> That means we can display this meta information in phpPgAdmin and not
> worry about having to re-implement it all.
>

You have to query something... doesn't bother me to go to the source.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-05-12 22:53:57 Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments
Previous Message Oliver Jowett 2005-05-12 21:43:55 Re: SQL_ASCII vs. 7-bit ASCII encodings