| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mischa Sandberg <mischa(dot)sandberg(at)telus(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2005-05-11 02:03:21 |
| Message-ID: | 200505110203.j4B23L317839@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Mischa Sandberg wrote:
> Quoting Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>
> >
> > Is there a TODO anywhere in this discussion? If so, please let me
> > know.
> >
>
> Umm... I don't think so. I'm not clear on what TODO means yet. 'Up for
> consideration'? If a "TODO" means committing to do, I would prefer to
> follow up on a remote-schema (federated server) project first.
TODO means it is a change that most people think would be a good idea.
It is not a committment from anyone to actually do it.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mischa Sandberg | 2005-05-11 02:05:38 | Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Mischa Sandberg | 2005-05-11 02:02:02 | Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mischa Sandberg | 2005-05-11 02:05:38 | Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Mischa Sandberg | 2005-05-11 02:02:02 | Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL |