| From: | Mischa Sandberg <mischa(dot)sandberg(at)telus(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2005-05-11 02:05:38 |
| Message-ID: | 1115777138.42816872a29a7@webmail.telus.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Quoting Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Mischa Sandberg wrote:
> > Quoting Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> > > Is there a TODO anywhere in this discussion? If so, please let
> me
> > > know.
> > >
> >
> > Umm... I don't think so. I'm not clear on what TODO means yet. 'Up
> for
> > consideration'? If a "TODO" means committing to do, I would prefer
> to
> > follow up on a remote-schema (federated server) project first.
>
> TODO means it is a change that most people think would be a good
> idea.
> It is not a committment from anyone to actually do it.
I think there has not been enough commentary from "most people".
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-05-11 02:14:22 | Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-05-11 02:03:21 | Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mischa Sandberg | 2005-05-11 02:06:27 | Re: Partitioning / Clustering |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-05-11 02:03:21 | Re: [PERFORM] "Hash index" vs. "b-tree index" (PostgreSQL |