| From: | Terry Lee Tucker <terry(at)esc1(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_index question |
| Date: | 2005-03-25 21:30:31 |
| Message-ID: | 200503251630.31833.terry@esc1.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
To answer my own question, "No it won't work." I still get a unique constraint
error.
On Friday 25 March 2005 04:10 pm, Terry Lee Tucker saith:
> Hi,
>
> If I were to set the value of pg_class.indisunique on a unique index to
> False inside a transaction so I could juggle sequence numbers around on a
> table with a unique two element index, and then set it back again to its
> proper value, all in the same transaction, would that allow me to
> temorarily override the unique index behavior? Is it safe to temporarily
> change the value of that column?
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
--
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2005-03-25 21:52:36 | Re: pg_index question |
| Previous Message | Terry Lee Tucker | 2005-03-25 21:10:59 | pg_index question |