Re: pg_index question

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: Terry Lee Tucker <terry(at)esc1(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_index question
Date: 2005-03-25 21:53:07
Message-ID: 1111787587.12450.16.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Umm, I tried it and it worked. Sure you got the right relid?

On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 15:30, Terry Lee Tucker wrote:
> To answer my own question, "No it won't work." I still get a unique constraint
> error.
>
> On Friday 25 March 2005 04:10 pm, Terry Lee Tucker saith:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If I were to set the value of pg_class.indisunique on a unique index to
> > False inside a transaction so I could juggle sequence numbers around on a
> > table with a unique two element index, and then set it back again to its
> > proper value, all in the same transaction, would that allow me to
> > temorarily override the unique index behavior? Is it safe to temporarily
> > change the value of that column?
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Terry Lee Tucker 2005-03-25 21:59:34 Re: pg_index question
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2005-03-25 21:52:36 Re: pg_index question