| From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joel Fradkin <jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: MSSQL versus Postgres timing |
| Date: | 2005-02-01 17:06:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20050201170654.GA65518@winnie.fuhr.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:54:11AM -0500, Joel Fradkin wrote:
>
> A table with 645,000 records for associates has view (basically select *
> from tblassociates where clientnum = 'test')
>
> This is taking 13 seconds in postgres and 3 seconds in MSSQL.
Please post the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output for the slow query, once
with enable_seqscan on and once with it off. For example:
SET enable_seqscan TO on; -- if not already on
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM tblassociates WHERE clientnum = 'test';
SET enable_seqscan TO off;
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM tblassociates WHERE clientnum = 'test';
> Be glad to provide the view and tables etc.
Please do -- it might help us spot something that could be improved.
What version of PostgreSQL are you using?
--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bricklen Anderson | 2005-02-01 17:25:41 | Re: MSSQL versus Postgres timing |
| Previous Message | Dennis Sacks | 2005-02-01 17:00:30 | Re: |