Re: MSSQL versus Postgres timing

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: Joel Fradkin <jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MSSQL versus Postgres timing
Date: 2005-02-01 17:06:54
Message-ID: 20050201170654.GA65518@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:54:11AM -0500, Joel Fradkin wrote:
>
> A table with 645,000 records for associates has view (basically select *
> from tblassociates where clientnum = 'test')
>
> This is taking 13 seconds in postgres and 3 seconds in MSSQL.

Please post the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output for the slow query, once
with enable_seqscan on and once with it off. For example:

SET enable_seqscan TO on; -- if not already on
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM tblassociates WHERE clientnum = 'test';

SET enable_seqscan TO off;
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM tblassociates WHERE clientnum = 'test';

> Be glad to provide the view and tables etc.

Please do -- it might help us spot something that could be improved.
What version of PostgreSQL are you using?

--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bricklen Anderson 2005-02-01 17:25:41 Re: MSSQL versus Postgres timing
Previous Message Dennis Sacks 2005-02-01 17:00:30 Re: