Re: MSSQL versus Postgres timing

From: "Joel Fradkin" <jfradkin(at)wazagua(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MSSQL versus Postgres timing
Date: 2005-02-01 20:19:19
Message-ID: 000101c5089b$654bb2a0$797ba8c0@jfradkin
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Fuhr [mailto:mike(at)fuhr(dot)org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 12:07 PM
To: Joel Fradkin
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] MSSQL versus Postgres timing

On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:54:11AM -0500, Joel Fradkin wrote:
>
> A table with 645,000 records for associates has view (basically select *
> from tblassociates where clientnum = 'test')
>
> This is taking 13 seconds in postgres and 3 seconds in MSSQL.

Please post the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output for the slow query, once
with enable_seqscan on and once with it off. For example:

SET enable_seqscan TO on; -- if not already on
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM tblassociates WHERE clientnum = 'test';

SET enable_seqscan TO off;
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM tblassociates WHERE clientnum = 'test';

> Be glad to provide the view and tables etc.

Please do -- it might help us spot something that could be improved.
What version of PostgreSQL are you using?

--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/

Attachment Content-Type Size
explainanalyzeviwassoclist_noseqscan.txt text/plain 1.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PFC 2005-02-01 21:47:19 Re: MSSQL versus Postgres timing
Previous Message Joel Fradkin 2005-02-01 19:26:07 Re: MSSQL versus Postgres timing