From: | sdfasdfas sdfasdfs <descuarinjado(at)yahoo(dot)es> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | "Group By " index usage |
Date: | 2004-11-24 17:36:59 |
Message-ID: | 20041124173659.2441.qmail@web54301.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
I have a table with this index:
create index ARTISTS_NAME on ARTISTS (
lower(AR_NAME)
);
Te index is over a colum with this definition:
AR_NAME VARCHAR(256) null,
I want to optimize this query:
select * from artists where lower(ar_name) like
lower('a%') order by lower(ar_name) limit 20;
I think the planner should use the index i have. But
the result of the explain command is:
explain analyze select * from artists where
lower(ar_name) like lower('a%') order by
lower(ar_name) limit 20;
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=20420.09..20420.14 rows=20 width=360)
(actual time=2094.13..2094.19 rows=20 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=20420.09..20433.52 rows=5374
width=360) (actual time=2094.13..2094.16 rows=21
loops=1)
Sort Key: lower((ar_name)::text)
-> Index Scan using artists_name on artists
(cost=0.00..19567.09 rows=5374 width=360) (actual
time=0.11..1391.97 rows=59047 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((lower((ar_name)::text) >=
'a'::text) AND (lower((ar_name)::text) < 'b'::text))
Filter: (lower((ar_name)::text) ~~
'a%'::text)
Total runtime: 2098.62 msec
(7 rows)
The "ORDER BY" clause is not using the index!. I don't
know why.
I have the locale configured to C, and the index works
well with the "like" operator.
¿Could you help me? I am really lost.
______________________________________________
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!: ¡100 MB GRATIS!
Nuevos servicios, más seguridad
http://correo.yahoo.es
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-24 17:55:23 | Re: "Group By " index usage |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2004-11-24 17:11:56 | Re: [PERFORMANCE] Big number of schemas (3500) into a single database |