From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | sdfasdfas sdfasdfs <descuarinjado(at)yahoo(dot)es> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: "Group By " index usage |
Date: | 2004-11-24 17:55:23 |
Message-ID: | 10877.1101318923@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
sdfasdfas sdfasdfs <descuarinjado(at)yahoo(dot)es> writes:
> I have a table with this index:
> create index ARTISTS_NAME on ARTISTS (
> lower(AR_NAME)
> );
> Te index is over a colum with this definition:
> AR_NAME VARCHAR(256) null,
> I want to optimize this query:
> select * from artists where lower(ar_name) like
> lower('a%') order by lower(ar_name) limit 20;
> I think the planner should use the index i have.
Update to 7.4, or declare the column as TEXT instead of VARCHAR.
Older versions aren't very bright about situations involving
implicit coercions.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bo Stewart | 2004-11-24 17:58:06 | Hardware purchase question |
Previous Message | sdfasdfas sdfasdfs | 2004-11-24 17:36:59 | "Group By " index usage |