From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: psql \e broken again |
Date: | 2004-11-14 19:11:30 |
Message-ID: | 200411142011.30735.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> I think the rationale was to allow paths containing spaces, which is
> a pretty serious problem on Windows. Seems like we have two basic
> options:
>
> 1. Quote only on Windows.
>
> 2. Expect user to put quotes in the EDITOR value if it contains a
> space-containing path.
The EDITOR variable seems to have a fairly standard meaning on Unix
systems. I've been using that EDITOR value for years without problems,
only when I use psql's \e once in a while it breaks. I don't think we
should deviate from what seems to be a standard practice.
I wonder whether a similar convention exists on Windows. I could
certainly live with quoting only on Windows if that is what the
convention is there.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-14 19:28:55 | Re: psql \e broken again |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-14 18:55:27 | Re: psql \e broken again |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-14 19:28:55 | Re: psql \e broken again |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-14 18:55:27 | Re: psql \e broken again |