Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0

From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0
Date: 2004-10-15 01:50:18
Message-ID: 20041015015018.GA5285@penne.toroid.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

(I apologise for the delayed response.)

At 2004-10-07 01:23:56 -0400, gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu wrote:
>
> So why is this part of the patch ok? Isn't it going to make libpq get
> confused every time a PQExecPrepared sends a v3.0 prepare message?

I thought about that for a while, but I couldn't find anything that is
actually broken or confused by the patch. I could be missing something
obvious, though, so I'd appreciate another set of eyes looking at it.

Does anyone have any ideas?

-- ams

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-10-15 04:24:34 Re: Strange code in initdb
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2004-10-15 00:10:59 Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ...

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-10-15 04:54:28 Re: pg_ctl restart failed on Win32
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-10-15 01:36:51 Re: pg_ctl cleanup