Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0

From: David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0
Date: 2004-10-18 17:06:29
Message-ID: 0D7873B9-2128-11D9-A3E3-000A95B9602E@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Oct 14, 2004, at 6:50 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:

> I thought about that for a while, but I couldn't find anything that is
> actually broken or confused by the patch. I could be missing something
> obvious, though, so I'd appreciate another set of eyes looking at it.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas?

Not I, but I still have my fingers crossed that this will go in in time
for 8.0. I think that Tom said it looked good when you first posted the
patch.

So, core hackers, is it going in or not? The dynamic language driver
developers will thank you for it!

Many thanks,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-10-18 17:15:55 Re: Using ALTER TABLESPACE in pg_dump
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-18 17:04:00 Re: V3 protocol gets out of sync on messages that cause allocation failures

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-18 17:06:57 Re: pg_regress --temp-keep
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-10-18 16:51:10 Re: [PATCHES] Open Items