From: | David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 |
Date: | 2004-10-18 17:06:29 |
Message-ID: | 0D7873B9-2128-11D9-A3E3-000A95B9602E@kineticode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Oct 14, 2004, at 6:50 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> I thought about that for a while, but I couldn't find anything that is
> actually broken or confused by the patch. I could be missing something
> obvious, though, so I'd appreciate another set of eyes looking at it.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas?
Not I, but I still have my fingers crossed that this will go in in time
for 8.0. I think that Tom said it looked good when you first posted the
patch.
So, core hackers, is it going in or not? The dynamic language driver
developers will thank you for it!
Many thanks,
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-18 17:15:55 | Re: Using ALTER TABLESPACE in pg_dump |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-18 17:04:00 | Re: V3 protocol gets out of sync on messages that cause allocation failures |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-18 17:06:57 | Re: pg_regress --temp-keep |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-18 16:51:10 | Re: [PATCHES] Open Items |