| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Sergej Sergeev <sergej(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plperl features |
| Date: | 2004-10-11 18:59:01 |
| Message-ID: | 200410112059.01916.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> We expected this to a degree of course, but if we can get some of
> them in, it would be nice for the community
> who wants to use plPerl.
On the other hand, it wouldn't be that nice for the community that
respects a good freeze. As you know, there will always be one more
feature.
Considering that we're already a long time into the beta phase, and
we're still working out portability issues especially in the various
plug-ins, we really ought to be strict about the freeze in that area if
we ever want to get finished.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sean Chittenden | 2004-10-11 19:02:09 | Re: Slightly better testing for pg_ctl(1)'s -w... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-11 18:56:30 | Re: Slightly better testing for pg_ctl(1)'s -w... |