Re: plperl features

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Sergej Sergeev <sergej(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl features
Date: 2004-10-11 19:10:47
Message-ID: 200410111910.i9BJAl903430@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > We expected this to a degree of course, but if we can get some of
> > them in, it would be nice for the community
> > who wants to use plPerl.
>
> On the other hand, it wouldn't be that nice for the community that
> respects a good freeze. As you know, there will always be one more
> feature.
>
> Considering that we're already a long time into the beta phase, and
> we're still working out portability issues especially in the various
> plug-ins, we really ought to be strict about the freeze in that area if
> we ever want to get finished.

Agreed. This is the downside of being bundled with the server. Sorry.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-10-11 19:11:04 Re: plperl features
Previous Message Sean Chittenden 2004-10-11 19:02:09 Re: Slightly better testing for pg_ctl(1)'s -w...