From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: row wise comparison broken |
Date: | 2004-09-10 05:10:39 |
Message-ID: | 200409100510.i8A5Adc14407@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > > Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > > > I guess this means that PostgreSQL does not fully support SQL's
> > > > row-wise comparison. We need to add this to the TODO list?
> > >
> > > I thought it was there already ... certainly this has been discussed
> > > before ...
> >
> > This was discussed (including a possible implementation of the correct
> > behavior) at some length on the performance list a little over a month
> > ago. I don't think it made it to Bruce who probably would have added to
> > the todo list...the consensus was the current behavior is wrong but
>
>
> Yes, I found the following thread started by you in the
> pgsql-performance list:
>
> Subject: [PERFORM] best way to fetch next/prev record based on index
> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:18:43 -0700
>
> > there were some concerns about backwards compatibility.
>
> IMO 8.0 is a good chance to fix it. Maybe we could add a GUC switch to
> fall back to pre-8.0 behavior...
I remember the thread but didn't see a TODO in there at the time.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-09-10 05:26:41 | Re: row wise comparison broken |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-09-10 03:31:48 | Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates |