From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com |
Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: row wise comparison broken |
Date: | 2004-09-09 22:33:23 |
Message-ID: | 20040910.073323.15268600.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > > I guess this means that PostgreSQL does not fully support SQL's
> > > row-wise comparison. We need to add this to the TODO list?
> >
> > I thought it was there already ... certainly this has been discussed
> > before ...
>
> This was discussed (including a possible implementation of the correct
> behavior) at some length on the performance list a little over a month
> ago. I don't think it made it to Bruce who probably would have added to
> the todo list...the consensus was the current behavior is wrong but
Yes, I found the following thread started by you in the
pgsql-performance list:
Subject: [PERFORM] best way to fetch next/prev record based on index
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:18:43 -0700
> there were some concerns about backwards compatibility.
IMO 8.0 is a good chance to fix it. Maybe we could add a GUC switch to
fall back to pre-8.0 behavior...
--
Tatsuo Ishii
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-09-09 23:20:11 | Re: Supporting Encryption in Postgresql |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-09-09 22:11:22 | Re: Clarification of action on Delete |