From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message |
Date: | 2004-07-10 17:37:59 |
Message-ID: | 200407101737.i6AHbxS26698@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >>> Do we want to add this to TODO:
> >>> * Issue an extra message when COMMIT completes a failed transaction
> >>
> >> No --- it's (a) wordy and (b) not responsive to the original complaint,
> >> which was that a client that examines command completion tags will be
> >> easily misled. We should either change the command tags or do nothing.
>
> > I am not excited about changing the command tag.
>
> I was not either to start with, but the more I think about it, the more
> I think it would be a good idea.
What tag would we use? ABORT?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-10 18:44:11 | Re: BUG #1188: evaluation order of select seems to be wrong |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-10 16:48:14 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2004-07-10 17:45:20 | Re: Update pg_tables, pg_index views to show tablespace name? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-10 17:00:22 | Re: Memory management with C aggregate |