| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message |
| Date: | 2004-07-10 16:48:14 |
| Message-ID: | 12013.1089478094@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>>> Do we want to add this to TODO:
>>> * Issue an extra message when COMMIT completes a failed transaction
>>
>> No --- it's (a) wordy and (b) not responsive to the original complaint,
>> which was that a client that examines command completion tags will be
>> easily misled. We should either change the command tags or do nothing.
> I am not excited about changing the command tag.
I was not either to start with, but the more I think about it, the more
I think it would be a good idea.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-10 17:37:59 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-10 14:54:42 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-10 17:00:22 | Re: Memory management with C aggregate |
| Previous Message | Mike Rylander | 2004-07-10 16:46:52 | Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All |