| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)qwest(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: email browser? |
| Date: | 2004-06-19 16:04:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20040619160457.GA30434@wolff.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 19:21:07 -0600,
Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)qwest(dot)net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 08:24, Chris Browne wrote:
> > "Santo Quartarone" <quartarone1(at)rogers(dot)com> writes:
> > > What's the safest email browser?
> >
> > less is pretty safe, more or less ;-).
> >
> > You didn't specify what sort of platform you wanted to use; the
> > choices vary, considerably, between platforms.
>
> I'd say pine is pretty darned safe...
While both pine and mutt have had remote exploit bugs in the past, they
are probably your safeest alternatives. I prefer mutt as it is more
configurable and has a faster to use (IMO) interface than pine.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-19 19:08:41 | Re: [PATCHES] Tablespace patch review |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-06-19 15:23:05 | Re: Compilation failes in CVS tip |