From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Tablespace patch review |
Date: | 2004-06-19 19:08:41 |
Message-ID: | 18101.1087672121@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
[ switching to pghackers for wider comment ]
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> By the way, I think that we should deny users the ability to create
> tablespaces that begin with pg_. Also, the existing ones should be
> pg_global and pg_default. That way, we have room to move if ever we
> decide we want more system tablespaces. It also makes it easier to dump
> non-system tablespaces.
Seems like a reasonable suggestion to me. Any objections?
BTW, another argument for this is that "default" is a reserved word.
I'd already noticed in testing that CREATE TABLE ... TABLESPACE default
doesn't work unless you double-quote "default". Calling it pg_default
would avoid that annoyance.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-06-19 19:25:45 | Re: Tablespace patch review |
Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2004-06-19 16:04:57 | Re: email browser? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2004-06-19 19:11:30 | Re: Tablespace patch review |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-19 19:03:25 | Re: eventlog fix |