From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improving postgresql.conf |
Date: | 2004-06-11 17:02:52 |
Message-ID: | 200406111702.i5BH2qP02427@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
[ PGP not available, raw data follows ]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> | Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> |
> |>Bruce Momjian wrote:
> |>
> |> > I understand your points below. However, the group has weighed in the
> |> > direction of clearly showing non-default values and not duplicating
> |> > documentation. We can change that, but you will need more folks
> |> > agreeing with your direction.
> |>
> |>I don't remember the behaviour but tell me what happen if
> |>I comment out a value changing the value. Kill UP the postmater.
> |>Recommenting that value and now re killing the postmaster.
> |>
> |>I believe that postmaster will not run with the default value.
> |>Who will look the configuration file will not understand the right
> |>reality.
> |
> |
> | If you comment a variable in postgresql.conf, it will use the
> | default value.
>
> That's not true at least with the version 7.4.2.
>
> Try yourself, I did the experiment changing the cpu_tuple_cost and
> commenting out the cpu_tuple_cost, after sending the SIGHUP to
> postmaster the value remain: 0.005 that is not the default value at
> all.
Oh, sorry, you are right. Not sure if this is a bug or not.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-06-11 17:07:24 | Re: Compiling libpq with VisualC |
Previous Message | Steve Atkins | 2004-06-11 17:00:26 | Re: Accelerating aggregates |