From: | "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)qwest(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Gaetano Mendola" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improving postgresql.conf |
Date: | 2004-06-11 17:15:50 |
Message-ID: | 1086974150.31155.3.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 11:02, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> [ PGP not available, raw data follows ]
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > | Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> > |
> > |>Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > |>
> > |> > I understand your points below. However, the group has weighed in the
> > |> > direction of clearly showing non-default values and not duplicating
> > |> > documentation. We can change that, but you will need more folks
> > |> > agreeing with your direction.
> > |>
> > |>I don't remember the behaviour but tell me what happen if
> > |>I comment out a value changing the value. Kill UP the postmater.
> > |>Recommenting that value and now re killing the postmaster.
> > |>
> > |>I believe that postmaster will not run with the default value.
> > |>Who will look the configuration file will not understand the right
> > |>reality.
> > |
> > |
> > | If you comment a variable in postgresql.conf, it will use the
> > | default value.
> >
> > That's not true at least with the version 7.4.2.
> >
> > Try yourself, I did the experiment changing the cpu_tuple_cost and
> > commenting out the cpu_tuple_cost, after sending the SIGHUP to
> > postmaster the value remain: 0.005 that is not the default value at
> > all.
>
> Oh, sorry, you are right. Not sure if this is a bug or not.
This point has come up before, and I think it's intended behavior.
Stopping and restarting the database will, of course, make it load the
defaults.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Manfred Koizar | 2004-06-11 17:24:31 | Re: Another unpleasant surprise using inheritance |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-06-11 17:07:24 | Re: Compiling libpq with VisualC |