Core vs non-Core (Was: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion)

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Core vs non-Core (Was: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion)
Date: 2004-05-20 00:48:20
Message-ID: 20040519213942.K5739@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 19 May 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Hans-Jrgen Schnig wrote:

> If people think this is a good idea I could compile and maintain this
> (source) distribution ...

I'd love to see something like this ...

One question I have is what would it take to extend teh build system in
core so that it was easier to do this? For instance, for those wishing to
do something like this, what would it take to have it so that you could
'cvs checkout':

pgsql (the core)
pgsql/src/interfaces/jdbc (from pgfoundry)
pgsql/src/interfaces/odbc (from pgfoundry)

I know that pulling in the various source codes isn't a difficult script
to write, but how about adding in the building of the included modules?
Maybe have the optional modules in a pgsql/src/modules directory?

I know its doable ... apache does it ...

... and I've seen other software/projects where configure in the root
calls configure in the modules directory itself, so that's doable ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-05-20 00:49:07 Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-05-20 00:39:07 Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion