Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Date: 2004-05-20 00:39:07
Message-ID: 20040519213726.E5739@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 19 May 2004, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> Personally, I hate the idea of having to write stuff like this example
> Joe Conway gave the other day from PL/R:
>
> #if (CATALOG_VERSION_NO <= 200211021)
> #define PG_VERSION_73_COMPAT
> #elif (CATALOG_VERSION_NO <= 200310211)
> #define PG_VERSION_74_COMPAT
> #else
> #define PG_VERSION_75_COMPAT
> #endif

Why not have seperate branches in CVS for each version? Branch on similar
dates to the core distribution itself?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-05-20 00:48:20 Core vs non-Core (Was: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion)
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-05-20 00:36:50 Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion