Re: Comments on patch for date_trunc( 'week', ... );

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Creager <Robert_Creager(at)LogicalChaos(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comments on patch for date_trunc( 'week', ... );
Date: 2004-03-05 02:41:18
Message-ID: 200403050241.i252fIB10840@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Patch applied. Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert Creager wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
>
> Per a brief conversation with Tom, I've created a patch for adding support for
> 'week' within the date_trunc function.
>
> Within the patch I added a couple of test cases and associated target output,
> and changed the documentation to add 'week' appropriately.
>
> Comments? Should I of bypassed this list and subscribed/posted to the patch
> list?
>
> Cheers,
> Rob
>
> --
> 17:07:39 up 15 days, 46 min, 4 users, load average: 2.18, 2.23, 2.27
> Linux 2.4.21-0.13_test #60 SMP Sun Dec 7 17:00:02 MST 2003

[ Attachment, skipping... ]
-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2004-03-05 03:00:49 Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-03-05 02:14:49 Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right