Re: using Postgres to store many small files

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Matthew Hixson <hixson(at)poindextrose(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: using Postgres to store many small files
Date: 2004-03-04 07:59:06
Message-ID: 200403040759.06759.dev@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thursday 04 March 2004 01:03, Matthew Hixson wrote:
[snip]
> I recently discovered the Hibernate project and was pleasantly
> surprised how simple it was to store an image in Postgres as a bytea
> using Hibernate's BLOB support. I'm wondering if Postgres would have
> any problem handling all of our files if we were to put them into
> Postgres as bytea data. And how well would Postgres scale as the
> number of files increased?

PG itself cares nothing whether the data is text or bytea - it won't be able
to compress the data much presumably (if they are GIF/JPEG). The only issue I
can think of is that you will have to access these images through PG rather
than the filesystem - worth checking there aren't any little utilities
relying on that.

> Our Java application and Postgres are currently running on the same
> machine, a dual Xeon 2.6Ghz with 1GB of RAM. We are currently not
> working this machine very hard at all.

More RAM might be an idea - it's not expensive. Also - consider whether this
will have an impact on your backup plans.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gellert, Andre 2004-03-04 10:34:41 Are Postgres 7.4.1 RPMs available for SuSE 9.0 ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-04 06:28:59 Re: gist index build produces corrupt result on first access to table.