Re: Comments on patch for date_trunc( 'week', ... );

Hey Bruce,

I never saw the patch hit the hackers list. Did any of you smart folks take a
look at it?

Cheers,
Rob

When grilled further on (Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:58:02 -0500 (EST)),
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> confessed:

>
> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
>
> I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Robert Creager wrote:
> -- Start of PGP signed section.
> >
> > Per a brief conversation with Tom, I've created a patch for adding support
> > for'week' within the date_trunc function.
> >
> > Within the patch I added a couple of test cases and associated target
> > output, and changed the documentation to add 'week' appropriately.
> >
> > Comments? Should I of bypassed this list and subscribed/posted to the patch
> > list?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rob
> >
> > --
> > 17:07:39 up 15 days, 46 min, 4 users, load average: 2.18, 2.23, 2.27
> > Linux 2.4.21-0.13_test #60 SMP Sun Dec 7 17:00:02 MST 2003
>
> [ Attachment, skipping... ]
> -- End of PGP section, PGP failed!
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
> + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
>

--
20:21:06 up 18 days, 3:59, 2 users, load average: 1.52, 1.31, 1.25
Linux 2.4.21-0.13_test #60 SMP Sun Dec 7 17:00:02 MST 2003