Re: Comments on adding more connection URL parameters.

From: Paul Thomas <paul(at)tmsl(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "pgsql-jdbc (at) postgresql (dot) org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comments on adding more connection URL parameters.
Date: 2004-02-04 18:09:42
Message-ID: 20040204180942.A25736@bacon
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On 04/02/2004 09:37 Kris Jurka wrote:
> [snip]
> As java.sql.Driver's only connection method is connect(String url,
> Properties info) we are always eventually dealing with both a url and a
> properties object. Internally pg takes the URL and parses it into
> various
> fields and sticks that all in the given properties object and then uses
> the properties object exclusively. This means that any parameter can be
> passed in either the properties object or the URL. So the debate between
> the url and the properties object is not an important one. I know you
> are
> specifically addresses Barry's proposed additional files, but I just
> wanted to make clear that url parameters and the properties data is the
> same thing.

True.

--
Paul Thomas
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
| Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for the Smaller
Business |
| Computer Consultants |
http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Curtis Stanford 2004-02-04 21:59:07 Postgresql 7.4.1 and JDBC setFetchSize
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2004-02-04 17:52:04 Re: storing true/false, was: Comments on adding more